On a wet and cold Saturday afternoon in May 2022, the Long Island Chapter, National Society Colonial Dames, XVII Century recognized the Powell Cemetery where Thomas Powell, the founder of Bethpage, may have been interred three hundred years ago.
Powell was entrusted with delicate negotiations on behalf of the Town of Huntington with both the native population and the new governor of New York at a time of change for the young town. Yet, almost immediately after completing that work, he left Huntington.

Powell, whose father’s name was also Thomas, is thought to have been born in New Haven in 1641. His father was part of the group of Puritans that travelled with the Rev. John Davenport and Theophilus Eaton first to Massachusetts, then to Connecticut where they established the colony of New Haven. Thomas, the son, may have been born in New Haven shortly after the colony was established in 1638.
Thomas Powell, Jr. apparently came to Huntington as an apprentice. Previous writings contend that he was apprenticed to Jonas Wood of Halifax. However, the existing records seem, to me at least, to point to Thomas Mathews as his master. In his annotations to the Huntington Town Records, Charles R. Street writes that “it appears by the Court records that he [Powell] had, when younger, lived with Jonas Wood nine years.” (HTR Vol. I, page 56 footnote).
The court records to which Street referred seems to be a 1662 lawsuit between Thomas Mathews and Joanna Wood, widow of Jonas Wood to collect a debt of £54 2s 2d. The case involved a dispute about rum and wine. Mathews, Wood, and Edward Higbee were involved in the rum and wine trade. In an earlier deposition, Mark Megs testified that he had helped Mathews load rum and wine onto a boat. Megs testified that he understood that Wood and Higbee had purchased the rum and wine from Mathews and that there was no partnership among the three men, that is Wood, Higbee and Mathews. The truth of the matter is not important for our purposes. It only goes to show that the existence or non-existence of a partnership among the three men was in question. (HTR Vol. I, page 13).
In the 1662 case, Powell testified that the writing in his master’s book was read to Wood or Higbee or both at Daniel Whitehead’s house in Oyster Bay and one of them (Wood or Higbee) agreed that the record was accurate. He further testified that he had lived with his master for nine years and that his master’s records had never been questioned. Mathews then testified that the entry in his book was a true entry and that the wines there mentioned were delivered on board a boat on account of “Edward higbe Jonas wood and him selff.” (HTR Vol. I, page 42).
Street seems to have been confused by a line (underlined below) in the records which lacks punctuation and also seems to be missing the word “of.”
Thomas powell deposed sayth, yt the writings yts in his masters books was redd to good higbe or good wood one or boeth of them he cannot tell which : viz : that particular accountes his master good wood and good higbe : touching the 6 pipes of wine and the pipe of rum. [a pipe is approximately 108 gallons]
Street appears to read “his master good wood and good higbe” as identifying wood as Powell’s master. However, in light of Mathews’ testimony that that liquor was delivered “upon account for Edward higbe[,] Jonas wood[,] and him selff” that line should be understood to mean that Powell’s master read the particular account of three men: Powell’s master, Wood, and Higbee. In other words, the word “master” must refer to Mathews, not Wood.
Further support for the supposition that Powell was indentured to Mathews, not Wood, is a transaction in 1665 in which Powell sold land as an agent for Mathews (HTR Vol. I, page 64). Powell also acted as an agent for Mathews for a land transaction in Oyster Bay in 1669 (OBTR Vol. I, page 56). If he had once worked and lived with Mathews, it would make sense that Mathews would appoint him to act on his behalf. Mathews would have been less likely to do so if Powell had worked for his adversary in the earlier court case.
In 1663, Powell purchased a home lot on Park Avenue near the Town Common. This is now the property on which the Dr. Daniel W. Kissam House sits at 434 Park Avenue. (HTR Vol. I, page 56). Incidentally, Powell was also the recorder at the time. He eventually owned several other parcels of land on both the north shore and south shore of Huntington (HTR Vol. I, page 128), including as part owner of one of the Ten Farms laid out in 1672 to counter claims to the Eastern Purchase asserted by Smithtown (HTR Vol. I, page 188).
Powell married Abigail Wood, daughter of Jonas Wood of Halifax, in 1664. They had eight children. Abigail died in 1688. Powell’s second wife was Elizabeth Phillips, and they had seven children. Over the years, Powell was entrusted with several public offices, such as layer out of land, overseer, and recorder.
Powell may have converted to Quakerism in 1672 when George Fox, the founder of the Society of Friends, visited Long Island. There had been Friends in Oyster Bay prior to Fox’s visit. In fact, Fox timed his arrival to be at Oyster Bay for the half year meeting, which lasted four days. After the meeting Fox stayed on Long Island for a few days and “had meetings in several parts thereof.” (George Fox’s Journal, Abridged by Percy Livingston Parker, Isbister and Company, London, 1903, page 433). Fox returned to Oyster Bay after a visit to Rhode Island and “had a very large meeting
Prior to this time, Powell had been chosen in 1667 to serve as Constable (HTR Vol. I, page 110). But when selected to serve as Constable fifteen years later he refused to serve “having scruples of swearing as the law directs” (HTR Vol. I, page 334). He also refused to take the oath required by law when he was chosen to serve as Commissioner in 1684 (HTR Vol. I, page 390).
Likewise, Powell refused to pay the minister’s rate. Huntington’s first minister, William Leverich, left town around 1670. Eliphalet Jones then occasionally preached in Huntington until 1676 when he became Huntington’s second resident minister. In addition to being given 20 acres of land, Jones received a stipend from the Town paid by the residents—except for Thomas Powell, whose refusal to pay the minister’s rate from 1676 through 1681 was noted in the Town records. (HTR Vol. I, page 308). As a Quaker, he did not wish to support the Congregationalist minister.
Despite his refusal to pay his share for support of the minister, Powell was called upon to represent Huntington’s interests before the new Royal Governor.
When Thomas Dongan, the new governor of New York, requested that the Town surrender the patent issued in 1666 and be given a new one—at a higher quit-rent, Powell was appointed to handle the negotiations. Dongan had been appointed governor by the Duke of York in September 1682. In March 1686, the new governor notified the towns on Long Island that he would auction to the highest bidder their excess lands, i.e., lands granted to them under their colonial patents, but not yet purchased from the Indians. The governor also advised the towns that would have to renegotiate their annual quit rents. (HTR Vol. I, page 436).
At the annual Town meeting in April 1686, it was unanimously voted to not surrender the Nichols Patent, but to give the governor a copy. The Town, of course, did not wish to pay for a new patent at a higher quit rent. The fact that the governor was Catholic probably added to the Puritan townsmen’s refusal.
The townsmen voted to appoint Powell and three other men to negotiate with the Indians to settle the boundaries between the Town’s land and the Indian lands and to purchase more land from the Indians. (HTR Vol. I, page 440). Two years earlier, Powell and three others were appointed at a Town meeting to negotiate with Indians who settled on the Town’s lands to pay rent or leave (never mind the fact that it was the Indians’ land to begin with). (HTR Vol. I, page 393). Powell had also been one of three Huntington men appointed to meet with the Chickenoe of the Massapauge Indians to confirm the line between Huntington and Oyster Bay on the south side of the Island (HTR Vol. I, page 90).
In October 1686, Powell was chosen, along with Isaac Platt, “to ackt to ye best of their discretion in our behalf” in discussions with the representatives appointed by the Governor to determine which lands had already been purchased from the Indians. (HTR Vol. I, page 468).
On November 4, 1686, Powell was elected to represent Huntington in Southampton. Two weeks later he was selected to represent the Town in New York—that would be quite a task to travel from one end of the Island to the other. (HTR Vol. I, page 470). By the end of November, the Town offered to pay £20 for a new patent with a quit rent of 20 shillings.
The new patent wasn’t issued until August 2, 1688. In that patent, Governor Dongan appointed Powell as one of the nine trustees of the “Freeholders and Comonality of ye Towne of Huntington” to manage the Town’s common lands. (HTR Vol. I, page 533). Less than two weeks later, Edmond Andros replaced Dongan as governor and Powell was sent back to New York to negotiate with the new governor. It is unknown what the negotiations would be about, and Andros did not issue a patent to Huntington to replace the Dongan Patent.
When all the negotiations were done, Powell submitted his expense report, which detailed his trip to New York, his meetings with the Indians (which were accompanied by quantities of rum), and his work marking the boundaries. (HTR Vol. II, page 7).
After two years representing the interests of the Town, travelling back and forth to New York, meeting with the Indian sachem Swanamee, and marking boundaries, Powell left Huntington. A deed dated April 18, 1689, identifies him as “latte of Huntington.” (HTR Vol II, page 38).
Where had he gone?
In 1695, Powell received a deed, known as the Bethpage Purchase, from the Indian proprietors of Massapege for a 15 square mile tract of land straddling the county border and encompassing the present-day communities of Bethpage, Farmingdale, Plainedge, Plainview, and parts of Melville. The deed notes that “part of above bounded lands having been in ye possession of ye sd Thomas Powell above seven years before the signing and dellevry hereof.” In other words, Powell was living there since 1688, immediately after he submitted his itemization of his expenses for representing the Town of Huntington in connection with the Dongan Patent. The following year, he secured permission from the Huntington Trustees to purchase that portion of the land located on the east side of the county line. (HTR Vol. II, page 188).
It is possible that the death of his first wife in 1688 had something to do with his decision to relocate.
Powell lived out his life in Bethpage. In 1698, he helped organize the Bethpage Preparative Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends. He died in 1722.

Thank You for this great article. As a descendent of Thomas Mathews, I was happy to see that your interpretation of the Huntington Town Records, with commentary from Charles Street, agree with my interpretation. I continue to research Thomas Mathews, his Long Island descendants, and search for his parents/place of birth. -Diane Matthews