Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

The story that has been told of the small, white, brick house at the northeast corner of Fort Salonga Road (NYS Route 25A) and Makamah Road is of an eccentric old unmarried woman—Miss Mary Osterby—who worked the farm dressed in her father’s Civil War uniform and sold beer to workers from the local brickyards.  It is a charming story of a quaint by-gone era.  Unfortunately, it is not accurate.  The real story is more complex.

Miss Mary was not an unmarried spinster; nor did her father fight in the Civil War.  Bentte Marie and her husband Bernard Osterby emigrated from Denmark in 1881.  He was a 47-year-old veteran of the Danish army, who reportedly received several medals for bravery.  She was 13 years younger.  They had been married for two years.  There are indications that he may have had a first wife and was the father of ten children, although this aspect of his life has not been confirmed.

Bernard Osterby purchased the four-acre property in March 1890 from the heirs of the Reverend Moses Rogers for $450.[1] Moses Rogers was born in 1793 and was one of the first Methodist ministers in Huntington.  Rogers had purchased the property in 1854 for $800.[2] The property included a large eighteenth century house.  This house may have been associated with the Presbyterian Church that was built at this corner in the late 1700s.  According to an account from the Reverend N.S. Prime, the church was removed in 1829 and “rebuilt at Red Hook” near the current location of the shopping center on the south side of Route 25A, west of Vernon Valley Road.[3]

Bernard Osterby borrowed $300 from Isaac Sammis of Northport to pay for the purchase.[4] Nineteen months after he purchased the property, Bernard transferred ownership to his wife.[5] A couple of weeks later, in November 1891, Mary and Bernard Osterby paid off the first mortgage and entered into a mortgage agreement with Elizabeth Slessor of Centerport for $600.[6

It is unclear when the Osterbys came to Fort Salonga, but they were here by 1888.  In that year, Jacob Jacobson had filed a complaint against Bernard Osterby for selling liquor without a license.  A trial on the complaint was set to begin, but Jacobson did not appear.  It was alleged that Osterby had threatened Jacobson.  In any event the case was dismissed, but Osterby was immediately re-arrested on a previous charge of disturbing the peace.[7]

Osterby continued to sell liquor illegally.  After a trial before Justice Strawson in Northport, he was convicted on that charge in 1890 and fined $50.[8] Justice Strawson heard about another complaint against Osterby two years later.  Johanes and Maren Kasso were recent Danish immigrates living near the Osterbys in a cottage at Breeze Hill farm (now Indian Hills Country Club).  Mrs. Kasso was a 32 year old mother.  She complained to Justice Strawson that the 57-year-old Osterby repeatedly went to her house while her husband was away.  It is unclear if criminal charges were ever filed, but Osterby again resorted to threats.  While out hunting, he ran into Mr. Kasso, pointed his gun in Kasso’s face and threatened to blow his head off if he didn’t mind his own business.[9]

Osterby was identified in an article in The Brooklyn Eagle in 1892 as a saloonkeeper.  He apparently catered to the workers in the nearby brickyards.  Apparently several others were also selling liquor—illegally—in the area and “the neighborhood has gained the reputation of being decidedly ‘tough’.”[10] So tough, in fact, that in 1896 blood was shed at Osterby’s place.  Osterby had taken advantage of a new liquor tax law, known as the Raines law, which allowed hotels to sell liquor.  So his place became a hotel where a number of foreigner workers from the brickyards stayed.  Two men, who apparently knew each other, boarded there without incident until one summer Sunday morning while one of them was eating dinner, the other, without saying a word, came in, picked up a large carving knife and struck the first man in the face, nearly cutting off his nose.  The other boarders were so shocked that the assailant was able to make his escape without any attempt being made to stop him.[11]

The next incident, four years later, was even worse.  At two o’clock on the morning of January 15, 1900, the entire house was destroyed by fire and one of the boarders, a 34-year-old immigrant,[12] did not make it out of the house.  The fire may have started when a gas lamp exploded.  Fifteen people were staying in the house at the time, including two children.  Osterby was awakened by the crackling of the fire and ran from room to room waking the boarders.  The woman staying with the two children escaped with one.  Mrs. Osterby returned to the house to rescue the other, a six-year-old girl.  Mrs. Osterby was badly burned on her face and hands.  The Osterbys lost all their belongings except for a small box of papers.[13]

The house was subject to a $1,000 mortgage the Osterbys had given in March 1899 to secure a loan from Francis Olmsted of Northport.  The house was insured for $1,000.  But it had been sold about two weeks before the fire to satisfy a judgment obtained by James O’Rorke, who had sued Osterby for unpaid wages.  No deed from this foreclosure sale could be found and the fact is that the Osterbys continued to live on the property.  According to the 1900 census, they were renters, but by 1910 they were listed as owning the house, subject to a mortgage.  Somehow, the Osterbys managed to hold onto the property.

An intriguing, but puzzling clue can be found in the County Clerk’s records.  On October 18, 1900, three documents were filed with the County Clerk.  The first is a mortgage dated October 13, 1900, which secured a $400 loan from Lewis Smith.  The security was described as the property that “this day was conveyed” to Bentte Marie Osterby by Lewis Smith.  The other two documents were deeds transferring the property—first from Osterby to Smith and then from Smith back to Osterby.  Both deeds were dated October 13, 1890—ten years earlier than they were recorded.  The deed from Bentte Marie Osterby to Smith identifies the property as being the same premises conveyed by Bernard Osterby to Bentte Marie Osterby on October 26, 1891.  Obviously the deed is a fake because it refers to a document with a later date.  And according to the mortgage the transfer of the property was contemporaneous with the mortgage, i.e. October 13, 1900, not 1890.

It is also interesting that the deed by which Smith conveyed the property back to Osterby—supposedly in 1890—contains a restriction:  “the said premises shall not hereafter be used for the sale therefrom or thereon of any spirituous liquors and in case such condition is broken the title to said premises shall be forfeited and the premises shall revert to the party of the first part,” i.e. Lewis Smith.[14] The one conviction against Bernard Osterby for illegally selling liquor was in July 1890—three months before the purported deed restriction.  But he continued to be identified as a saloonkeeper and he had obtained a Raines law certificate, which is issued to sellers of liquor.

We can speculate why these bogus deeds were created and filed.  Presumably, Osterby collected $1,000 from the insurance policy.  But there is no evidence that the  $1,000 Olmsted mortgage was ever paid–it was still open in 1957.  Most confusing of all is how they managed to hold onto the property.  Perhaps chastised, Osterby listed his occupation as farm laborer in the 1900 census.  But in 1910 he listed Boarding House.

It seems likely that the existing brick house was built to replace the house destroyed in the fire in 1900.  The original section of the existing house would have been too small to accommodate 15 people.  Brick construction was virtually unheard of for houses built in Huntington before the late nineteenth century.  Whereas using bricks to build a house after a devastating fire, especially when brickyards are located so close, makes sense.

In any event, Bernard Osterby died in May 1910.  His widow re-married by 1920.  Her new husband was an Irish immigrant named John Merry.  He was 16 years younger than his new wife and worked as a road laborer.

Mary Osterby finally sold the property in 1921 to Raymond Bloomer of Manhattan reserving for herself a life estate to all the buildings and the soil under farm tillage.  Bloomer could clear the woodland and build there.[15] Bloomer gave Mary Osterby a $1,000 mortgage, which was cancelled in November 1926.[16] Mary was still alive in 1926, but her date of death has not yet been found.

In 1948, Jane Bloomer Goverts inherited the property from her uncle Raymond Royce Kent, who died in Florida.  It is unclear who Raymond Royce Kent was or how he acquired the property from Raymond Bloomer.  There appears to be some family relationship because Kent’s niece was also named Bloomer.  Could the two Raymonds be the same person?

Goverts eventually lived in Rochester and may not have lived in the house.  In the summer of 1949, Eugene Mudge of Brooklyn rented the house.  Mudge purchased the house with one acre in 1957.  Mudge’s title insurance company evidently found the 1899 mortgage to Francis Olmsted that had never been cancelled.  Goverts filed an order to show cause in December 1957 to get the “ancient mortgage” discharged.

Mudge remodeled and expanded the house in the 1970s.  The current owners acquired it in 200X and expanded the kitchen. The small brick house remains intact and distinct, a relic of the property’s colorful past.  Marguerite Mudge, who was executive director of the Northport Historical Society in the 1980s, reveled in the house’s history, even if some of the facts were a little off.


[1] Suffolk County Clerk’s Office Deed Liber 330, page 35

[2] Suffolk County Clerk’s Office Deed Liber 77, page 59

[3] Huntington Babylon Town History, By Romanah Sammis (Huntington, NY 1937), page 189.

[4] Suffolk County Clerk’s Office Mortgage Liber 193, page 539

[5] Suffolk County Clerk’s Office Deed Liber 348, page 497

[6] Suffolk County Clerk’s Office Mortgage Liber 205, page 590.

[7] The Long-Islander, June 30, 1888

[8] The Brooklyn Eagle, July 10, 1890

[9] The Brooklyn Eagle, January 15, 1892 and census records

[10] The Long-Islander, June 30, 1888

[11] The Long-Islander, August 1, 1896

[12] He was a Dane named Niels Kiepner, according to The Brooklyn Eagle; or a Swede named Neilis Cobke, according to The Long-Islander

[13] The Brooklyn Eagle, January 15, 1900; The Long-Islander, January 19, 1900

[14] Suffolk County Clerk’s Office Deed Liber 501, pages 6 and 7; Suffolk County Clerk’s Office Mortgage Liber 271, page 173

[15] Suffolk County Clerk’s Office Deed Liber 1026, page 241

[16] Suffolk County Clerk’s Office Mortgage Liber 483, page 554 and Mortgage Liber 606, page 92

Read Full Post »

Just a month after assuming the Presidency following the assassination of William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt was accused by a southern newspaper of perpetrating “the most damnable outrage which has ever been perpetrated by any citizen of the United States” when he invited Booker T. Washington to dinner at the White House.  (Washington was not the first African American to meet with a President in the White House.  Frederick Douglass had met with Abraham Lincoln.  However, Washington was the first invited to dinner at the White House.)

Just two days after that dinner, the educator gave a speech at the Huntington Opera House entitled The Negro Problem in the South to “one of the largest lecture audiences the local Opera House ever held.” (The Long-Islander, May 31, 1907).  This appears to have been Washington’s first visit to Huntington, but he would later develop a close and affectionate connection with the place.

In 1901, Washington was the leading African American in the country.  He had just published his autobiography, Up From Slavery, and was becoming an informal presidential advisor.  Washington was born into slavery in 1856 in Virginia.  Following his emancipation at the end of the Civil War, he worked in salt furnaces and coal mines before putting himself through school.  He was a well-regarded teacher at Hampton Institute in Virginia in 1881, when the Institute’s president recommended him to the founders of Tuskegee Institute in Alabama as that school’s first leader—a position he would hold for the rest of his life

An important part of his duties as leader of Tuskegee was to raise money.  Initially such efforts were focused in the Boston area, but later concentrated on New York City.  By 1907, Washington was looking for a summer home on Long Island, where he would be near the wealthy philanthropist who supported his school.  The Van Wyck farm on West Neck was offered to him for a seasonal rental.  The farm’s owner, Helen Van Wyck Lockman described the place in a May 7, 1907 letter:

“The Huntington place adv. on Sunday is charmingly located by the Harbor side with no road or nuisance of any kind between.  It is a double old-fashioned house with parlor, large living room, large dining room with three windows on the water and eight bedrooms.  An extra could be provided for a man in one of the outbuildings.  There is a private lane leading down a hillside to the house.  Perhaps three acres of land are enclosed within it.  I own 600 feet to the waterfront.  There are 4 stalls in the barn.  I have another barn on my land should extra stalls be required.  The modern improvements are being put in now.  Possession June 1st. Rent for 4 months or longer $1000.”

Four days later, Washington’s agent sent Mrs. Lockman a $100 deposit for the $750 rental.  At the end of the month, The Long-Islander reported that Washington would be spending the summer at the Van Wyck farm and would be working on a book—perhaps My Larger Education, which was published in 1911.  In July, he gave a speech to 1,000 Huntingtonians at the Opera House entitled “Education as the Solution of the Race Problem.”

Washington told The Long-Islander that he came to Huntington for two reasons: to work and to rest.  He also said that he found that nature and man had worked together well to produce such a beautiful spot as Huntington.

Washington returned to the Van Wyck Farm in 1908 and in August of that year  “delighted a large Huntington audience at the Opera House Monday night, [August 17th] the proceeds of the entertainment being to assist the Huntington Sewing & Trade School.”   Washington’s support of the Trade School is appropriate because the guiding principle of Tuskegee was advancement through education—not only of academic subjects but of trade skills as well.

Washington returned to the Van Wyck Farm in 1909 and 1910.  The Long-Islander later reported that he proved to be “a most delightful neighbor.”   Early in June of 1909, he lamented at being away from Huntington for so long and reports that his niece and nephew pester him every day about returning to Huntington.

After four summers renting the Van Wyck Farm, Washington decided to purchase a house.  He selected a secluded spot in Fort Salonga overlooking the Long Island Sound.  The house was picked out by February of 1911, but Washington hadn’t seen it.  He asked Mr. & Mrs. Philip Payton to look it over for him and to let Mrs. Washington know what it was like so that she would know what to provide to furnish the house.  He described its location:

The house is right on the Sound and about 1/8 of a mile from the post office Fort Salonga.  You get off the steam cars at Northport and take the trolley to Northport Harbor and from there you have to take a team to the house.  A party named Brown, I think, occupied the house last summer.  I think it is called the Snyder place.” (BTW papers, Vol. 10, page 588-9)

Through a series of transactions, intended probably to disguise the identity of the ultimate purchaser, Washington acquired the house in April.  The New York Times reported that the house was in “one of the finest sections of Long Island—a neighborhood where many wealthy New Yorkers have large estates.”  The Times continues that “it was at first thought that Dr. Washington contemplated the erection of an institution similar to Tuskegee Institute on his newly acquired Long Island tract, but it is not now thought that he will carry out such a project, as it is not large enough for an institution of any size.”

The Times also reported that “it was said that there was no objection when it was learned that the negro educator had brought land upon which to build himself a Summer home, but when the rumor spread that he intended to add enough land to his holdings to erect an institution similar to Tuskegee for the education of negroes there was considerable dissatisfaction.”  (In fact, the house was already built when Washington acquired the property.)  The Times reported that neighbors formed a syndicate and offered to buy the property from Washington for $1,500 more than he had paid for it and to offer him another tract of land on the Sound not far from the property.  Washington had given a mortgage of $5,000 apparently in connection with the purchase of the property, so $1,500 would have been a substantial premium.

The Long-Islander seems to have out-reported The Times because the local paper made clear that the house will be used by Washington as his summer home and not for his “great educational work.”

There is little known about Washington’s time in Huntington.  A recently published biography includes only one sentence:  “Booker bought a summer house on Long Island where the family spent summers, although he traveled and spoke much of the time the family was relaxing on the beach.”  [ Norrell, Robert J., Up from History, The Life of Booker T. Washington (Cambridge, The Belknap Press 2009)]

While in residence in Fort Salonga, Washington addressed the congregation at the Presbyterian Church and St Paul’s Church in Northport. And reportedly, taught Sunday school at Bethel AME church in Huntington.

Washington’s tenure in Fort Salonga was short-lived.  He sold the house to Henry S. Brush in May 1914.  He contemporaneously purchased a house in Huntington Village from Brush.  The house on Green Street is now the location of Finley’s restaurant and was apparently purchased by Washington as an investment because in May 1914 he expressed his hope that the house is rented and kept rented because he did want to lose the income.  Later that year, the financial condition in the south was depressed because there was no market for cotton.  As a result, Washington says, it is necessary for him to realize something soon on the house in Huntington.   Washington died in 1915 at the age of 59.

The Fort Salonga property came into he ownership of the Huntington Land Company (of which Henry Brush may have been a part) and in 1915 was transferred for nine acres of shorefront property in Centerport.  Eventually, a family from Forest Hills acquired the property and used it as a summer residence for many years.

In 2005, the Town of Huntington, at the urging of former historical society trustee Thelma Jackson Abidally, designated the property a local historic landmark.  When the last member of the Forest Hills family died, the property was sold to a local contractor who had plans to build an addition.  Those plans were never realized and the house continues to sit vacant.

The contractor sold the house in 2007 to another local resident who in 2009 applied to have the landmark designation revoked so that he could demolish the historic house and build a new house on the site.  The owner was convinced to drop that application and has instead developed plans to relocate the house closer to the road, where it will be more visible, and to build his new house behind the relocated historic house.  Although moving historic houses from their original location is generally not favored, it should be noted that in this case the house had previously been moved at least once already to protect it from the severe erosion.

Read Full Post »

In 1909, the Huntington school district undertook the construction of a new building that was promised to be one of the best, modern-built schoolhouses in the state outside of the cities, according to The Long-Islander.

The site of the school, across from Old First Church, had been the center of education in Huntington since the eighteenth century.  The Huntington Academy was built here in 1795.  The Academy was replaced by the three story wood Union School building in 1858.  Thirty years later a primary school (today the west wing of Town Hall) was built.

At a construction cost of $105,000, the new High School building featured accommodations and equipment for laboratory work, manual training and trade school work, drawing and other necessary departments of a modern curriculum.  The new building had a gymnasium, library, and botany room as well as three floors of classrooms and offices, (though the auditorium was not built until 1928). The school had two curriculums: one for those who planned to attend college, and one for those who did not.

In February of 1909, the alumni and other “generously minded citizens” were asked to make donations towards furnishing the new school.  Unfortunately, construction delays prevented the building from opening in time for the September 1909 school term, but by Thanksgiving the building was completed.  A picture of the old Huntington Academy was hung in the new building, and the small bell from the old school house was retrieved from the firehouse, after 50 years of residence there, and was also housed at the new school.  The fire department inscribed the bell with the years it served for fire duty as well as the time it called the children to the old Academy.

The official dedication was held on February 1, 1910 in the new assembly room on the second floor of the building, and was attended by over 600 people.  Gifts from alumni and citizens were received including the furnishing for the gymnasium by Miss Cornelia Prime, (who also donated $5000 to the construction), and a Steinway Piano by Dr. G. H. Carter, and a flag from Ringham & Campbell.  Speeches were made, a history of education in Huntington given, and music was played.  The next morning 380 students walked through the doors for the first time.  The number of students grew until 1958, when it had far exceeded the 600-person capacity.  Overcrowding had become such a problem that yet another new and modern high school was constructed.

The building was then used for the Junior High School grades until 1979.

 

Read Full Post »

At the beginning of the twentieth century only a handful of  commuters began their journey into New York City from the Huntington Train Station.  But in 1909, the Long Island Rail Road undertook massive system-wide improvements, including the construction of a new depot in Huntington, that helped to increase daily ridership from dozens to hundreds a day in the 1920s and to thousands a day now.

The Long Island Rail Road, founded in 1834 to provide a rail link from New York City to Boston, had arrived in Huntington in 1867.  The station was located on the west side of New York Avenue in a sparsely settled area two miles south of the Huntington business district.  Over the years, a thriving commercial district separate from Huntington village grew up around the station.

In 1900, the Pennsylvania Railroad purchased a controlling interest in the LIRR, as part of a joint plan to provide direct access to Manhattan.  With an infusion of new money after the merger, the Long Island Rail Road undertook system-wide capital improvements including the construction of Pennsylvania Station (which opened on September 8, 1910); direct access to Manhattan via tunnels under the East River; electrification of all trains west of Jamaica; and the elimination of grade crossings.

The improvements, with a price tag of over $50 million (the equivalent of over one billion dollars today), included $100,000 in improvements in the area around Huntington Station.  The local projects included building a new brick and stucco station house on the east side of New York Avenue; eliminating the grade crossing at New York Avenue by lowering the roadbed; and extending the existing trolley line, which then ran from Halesite to the train depot, down to Amityville.  The extended trolley line would be powered by electricity carried 35 miles from Long Island City to a transformer located east of the new station house.

In January 1909, the railroad unveiled plans for the new Huntington train station, which carried a price tag of $20,000 and featured a gambrel roof with dormers in both the front and back and two large columned porticos on either side of the waiting room.  The new station included direct access from the train to the trolley, which looped into the station on the north side of the tracks, east of the station house.

The new, improved service was greeted with anticipation that Huntington, which would now be just a fifty-minute train ride from the big, new terminal in Manhattan, would become “one of the most important towns on Long Island.”  The Long-Islander predicted that the improvements would “give Long Island by far the greatest boom in its history.”

“The magnificent new depot in Manhattan now nearing completion will in itself be a big advertisement for Long Island right in the heart of the commercial centre of the Western hemisphere,” The Long-Islander predicted.

Huntington’s new station house was opened to the public on October 21, 1909.  Although a “beautiful grove of big trees [had] been so wisely preserved at the northerly end of the tract,” the railroad did not have any plans for landscaping the one and half acre station grounds.  Beautification of the grounds was left up to the community.

The railroad depot and grounds are the first things that greet the eye of the stranger entering a village or city and the last thing upon leaving and the impression gained by the visitor from the appearances of the railroad station goes far towards forming his idea as to the character of the community,” The Long-Islander explained.  Moreover, properly designed and maintained grounds “will give an added dignity and sense of culture and refinement to the town.”  An attractive station “also means better conditions in other ways and a pride in the maintenance of the reputation of the place and the better preservation of law and order.”

The railroad graded the property and provided topsoil and fertilizer.  The Huntington Association, a group of Huntington’s wealthy summer residents, spearheaded a fund raising drive to underwrite the plantings.  Laurel and other attractive shrubbery were planted and “evergreens . . . set out so as to cut off the view of any unsightly buildings.”

Two years after the new depot was completed, the name of the surrounding community was officially changed from “Fairgrounds” to “Huntington Station.”  A decade later over 500 commuters a month traveled from Huntington.

The station became a point of pride for the community, especially after a new stationmaster, Maurice Schuck, arrived in 1916.  Agent Schuck, who lived in an apartment on the second floor of the station house, quickly gained a reputation for excellent service and for beautifying the station grounds, which were described as “an attractive park of stately trees, ornamental shrubs and beds of flowering plants.”  Year after year, he was recognized by the railroad for having the best-kept and most attractive station on Long Island.  Agent Schuck planted hundreds of flowers and bulbs that provided almost continuous bloom from June through the first frost.

Today the local community and the Long Island Rail Road have again joined forces to beautify this one hundred year old building located in the heart of Huntington Station.  A new group called Friends of Huntington Train Station has assumed the role previously played by the Huntington Association.

A century after their construction, the magnificent terminal in Manhattan is just a memory (having been demolished in 1963), but Huntington’s modest station house continues to serve local commuters.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts